IQ References
1. Hall A F. Occupational contact dermatitis among aircraft workers. JAMA 1944:125:179-185.
2. Clemmensen O, Knudsen H E. Contact sensitivity to aluminum in a patient hyposensitized with alumin-um precipitated grass poll-en. Contact Dermatitis 1980:6:303-308.
3. Fisher T, Rystedt I. A case of contact sensitivity to aluminu. Contact Dermatitis 1982:8:343.
4. Kotovirta M-L, Salo O P, Visa-Tolvanen K. Contact sensitivity to aluminum. Contact Dermatitis 1984:11:135.
5. Meding B, Augustsson A, Hansson C. Patch test reactions to aluminum. Contact Dermatitis 1984:10:107.
6. Fawcett H A, McGibbon D, Cronin E. Persistent vacc-ination granuloma due to aluminum sensitivity. Br J Dermatol 1985:113 (suppl. 29):101-102.
7. Veien N K, Hattel T, Justesen O, Nörholm A. Aluminum allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1986:15:295-297.
8. Böhler-Sommeregger K, Lindemayr H. Contact sensitivity to aluminum. Contact Dermatitis 1986:15:278-281.
9. Cox N H, Moss C, Forsyth A. Allergy to non-toxoid constituents of vaccines and implications for patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1988:18:143-146.
10. Castelain P Y, Castelain M, Vervloet D, Garbe L, Mallet B. Sensitization to aluminum by aluminum- precipitated dust and pollen extracts. Contact Dermatitis 1988:19:58-60.
11. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Peluso A M. Accidental dia-gnosis of aluminum sens-itivity with Finn Chambers. Contact Dermatitis 1990:23:48-49.
12. Cosnes A, Flechet M-L, Revuz J. Inflammatory nod-ular reactions after hepatitis B vaccination due to alum-inum sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1990:23:65-67.
13. Kaaber K, Nielsen A O, Veien N K. Vaccination gra-nulomas and aluminum all-ergy: course and prognostic factors. Contact Dermatitis 1992:26:304-306.
|
14. Nielsen AO, Kaaber K, Veien NK. Aluminum allergy caused by DTP vaccine. Ugeskr Laeger. 1992 Jun 29;154(27):1900-1. Danish.
15. Veien N K, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Systemically aggravated contact derm-atitis caused by aluminum in toothpaste. Contact Dermatitis 1993:28:199-200.
16. Dwyer C M, Kerr R E. Contact allergy to aluminum in 2 brothers. Contact Dermatitis 1993:29:36-38.
17. Lopez S, Pelaez A, Navarro LA, Montesinos E, Morales C, Carda C. Alum-inium allergy in patients hy-osensitized with aluminium-recipitated antigen extracts. Contact Dermatitis. 1994 Jul;31(1):37-40.
18. Barbaud A, Schmutz JL, Mougeolle JM. Cutaneous immunoallergic reactions caused by vaccines. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1995;122(3):129-38. Review. French.
19. Veien NK. Routine patch testing with AlCl3. Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Aug;35(2):126.
20. Helgesen AL, Austad J. Contact urticaria from aluminium and nickel in the same patient. Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Dec;37(6):303-4.
21. Bajaj AK, Gupta SC, Pandey RK, Misra K, Rastogi S, Chatterji AK. Aluminium contact sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Dec;37(6):307-8.
22. Skowron F, Grezard P, Berard F, Balme B, Perrot. Persistent nodules at sites of hepatitis B vaccination due to aluminium sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Sep;39(3):135-6.
23. Peters T, Hani N, Kirchberg K, Gold H, Hunzelmann N, Scharffetter- Kochanek K. Occupational contact sensitivity to aluminium in a machine construction plant worker. Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Dec;39(6):322-3.
24. Purello-D’Ambrosio F, Gangemi S, Minciullo PL, Lombardo G, Ricciardi L, Isola S, Merendino RA. Al-uminium allergy in a patient with occupational contact dermatitis. Allergol Immu-nopathol (Madr). 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):74-5.
25. Frosch P, Kligman A. The Duhring Chamber. Contact Dermatitis 1979:5:73-81. |
26. Kalveram K-J, Rapp-Frisk C, Sorck G. Misleading patch test results with Alum-inum Finn Chambers and mercury salts. Contact Dermatitis 1980:6:507-508.
27. Fischer T, Maibach H. Aluminum in Finn chambers reacts with cobalt and nickel salts in patch test materials. Contact dermatitis 1985:12:200-202.
28. Lachapelle J M, Douka M A. An evaluation of the compatibility between Alum-inum Finn chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum. Dermatosen 1985:33:12-14.
29. Lindeemayr H, Becerano S. Interaction of mercury compounds and aluminum. Contact Dermatitis 1985:13:274.
30. Kubo Y, Nonaka S, Yoshida H. False positive reaction to patch testing with aqueous mercuric chlo-ride in an aluminum Finn Chamber. Contact Dermatitis 1992:26:136-137.
31. Björkner B, Niklasson B. Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic com-pounds in the guinea pig. Contact Dematitis 1984:11:268-278.
32. Bruze M, Björkner B, Lepoittevin J-P. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethylcyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 1995:32:156-159.
33. Kubo Y, Anan S, Nonaka S, Yoshida H. Does patch testing with ammoniated mercury in a Finn Chamber give a false positive reac-tion? Contact Dermatitis 1992:27:118-119.
34. Fischer T. Design Con-siderations for patch testing. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1994:5:70-75.
35. Budavari S. Aluminum & Aliminium Oxide. The Merck Index, 11th edition, Rah-way, NJ., USA, Merck & Co., Inc. 1989, page 54, 58.
36. Guin J. (ed). Practical Contact Dermatitis. Niklasson B. Chapter 51, Appendix A. McGraw-Hill Inc. 1995.
37. Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg J.E, Maibach H.I. (ed). Handbook of Occu-pational Dermatology. Niklasson B. Chapter 184 Springer Verlag 2000. |